Sunday, March 17, 2013

Gender is Performed

Claim 1:

In her book from a chapter called Imitation and Gender Insubordination, Judith argues that gender is performative. It’s one thing to say that gender is performed and that is a little different from saying gender is performative.  When we say gender is performed we usually mean that we’ve taken on a role or we’re acting in some way and that our acting or our role playing is crucial to the gender that we are and the gender that we present to the world.  To say that gender is performative is a little different because for something to be performative means that it produces a series of effects. We act and walk and speak and talk in ways that consolidate an impression of being a man or being a woman. (Bulter p. 124)


To us this means that we are taught how to act. From a early age we are taught to act how the world perceives our gender. For example little girls are told to wear pink and play with Barbies; however if a little boy plays with Barbies or wears pink people think differently of the young boy because its not the social norm.  

Social norms play a big part in our gender. Women are taught they need to find their Prince Charming, marry them and have babies. They should learn how to cook and take care of a family. Viewed as weaker than men. It’s okay for women to be emotional. On the other hand men are taught to be masculine. For example men don’t have any emotions. They should suppress their emotions and problems.  They are rough and tough and should not complain about women. Men are expected to be physically tall, strong, and brave and so on.

We play into these roles, which makes us play out our gender. We are always performing our gender. Our gender is always being performed consciously and unconsciously.  

The examples:
I provided are too young  children, one is a boy play with “boy things”  and the other is a little girl dressed up in make up and high heels.  The examples put ideas into young minds about what they should and shouldn’t do. 







Questions.
            1. Do you think it’s possible for gender roles to be changed in the future?

            2. Do you think our culture has a big influence on gender roles and how we
                  perform gender?

            3. Should toys be regulated to form ideas of gender in young minds?

           4. Do you agree with Butler? In what ways do you perform gender?



The other example is a  Dove commercial. The woman starts explaining how dying her hair different colors makes her feel. Hair dye for her is like having a different mood like blonde is bubbly and red is passionate. The voice-over explains that dying her hair makes life "more vivid" and makes her want to laugh and dance. she does it to invoke these characteristics.



She then explains that she's blind. The commercial used her blindness to suggest that hair dye isn't about color at all. It's about the feeling having dyed hair gives you, even if you can't see the color.

The commercial implies that hair dye can change who you are. And teaches women that beauty is so important. This goes back to social norms and how we are suppose to act. She is performing her gender because she was taught how to act from a young age. 

Questions
1. Why do you think they used a blinded woman in the ad? What does it say about Dove? 
2.  If you had to make a commercial for Dove's hair care how would you use gender differently?

The Bad Copy



Claim 2:

 Judith Butler makes an argument in her book from a chapter called Imitation and Gender Insubordination, that heterosexuality sets it’s self up as the original, the true the authentic; the norm that determines the real and implies that “being” a lesbian (or homosexual) is always a kind of miming of what we know as heterosexuality.  She describes homosexuality being secondary to heterosexuality and a copy of the original origin of heterosexuality.  However, Butler would argue that there is no primary sexuality, even though a majority of our society and political system treats the male-female unit as the basic unit or norm.


Questions:

1.     Do you believe that heterosexuality is depicted as the “accepted norm” in today’s society? Please explain why or why not. 

2.   This argument points to the idea that heterosexuality operates as a political system. Meaning that the acceptance that the male-female unit is the basic unit. In what ways does this concept hold true in modern day America? (Ideas: Think about social structures, legal implications and economic structures)

3.   Do you agree with the favoritism towards heterosexuality couples that our society reinforces? Please explain why or why not.

The following media portray and support this claim that heterosexuality is the norm.  Please respond with reactions to them, and if possible, upload or post some media examples of your own.


Short clip from the movie The Family Stone 

The backstory is a family meeting their sons/brothers girlfriend Meredith, for the first time over Christmas. One night at dinner she decides to share some rather inappropriate beliefs with the family about Thad, one of the brothers and his partner wanting to adopt a child. Despite the beautifully prepared meal, everyone has lost their appetite due to Meredith's awkward confrontations about race, deafness, and sexual orientation.


        1. What was your reaction to this scene and how did it make you feel?  How do you think this ties in with Judith Butler’s claim of heterosexuality as the norm?

Cartoon and advertising piece mocking the idea of hetero-normativity (pictured below)

    1. What were your initial reactions to the cartoon and advertisement? 


*This cartoon is mocking the idea of heterosexual as the norm through making the heterosexual couples seem ashamed for being together, and the homosexual couples judging them and appearing puzzled over the fact that they are together. 

*This advertisement depicts homosexuality as the norm through the commonality of attractive homosexual couples, and the downplaying and ridiculing of the less attractive heterosexual couple.